The Journal of Human-Social Nexus aims to serve as a premier academic platform for the dissemination of research that contributes to the development of a better society. Rooted in the publisher’s commitment to "Academics for a Better Society," the journal seeks to publish high-quality, impactful studies that drive positive social, cultural, and policy changes across the globe. The journal’s purpose is to foster interdisciplinary research that not only enriches academic knowledge but also provides tangible solutions to the forthcoming societal challenges.

With a focus on social change, human rights, and societal progress, the journal offers a forum for scholars to present innovative ideas, reflect on pressing global issues, and explore transformative ways in which the humanities and social sciences can shape a more just, sustainable, and equitable world.

Journal of Human-Social Nexus welcomes original research, review articles, and thoughtful letters to the editor in all areas of the humanities and social sciences. The journal is committed to publishing research that aligns with its mission of "Academics for a Better Society", seeking contributions that engage with social problems, cultural developments, ethical considerations, and policy reforms. We encourage studies that aim to create new perspectives and actionable solutions for the challenges faced by communities worldwide.

The journal covers a wide range of disciplines, grouped into key departments:

1. Social Sciences & Policy

• Anthropology

• Sociology

• Psychology

• Demography

• Political Science

• Social Policy

• Urban Studies

• Risk Management

• International Relations

• International Political Economy

• Development Studies

Description:
This area explores how societies function and evolve, emphasizing the role of policies in improving the lives of individuals and communities. Contributions in this category aim to create positive societal change through research on governance, social justice, policy-making, and the development of effective public services that address global challenges.

2. Humanities & Cultural Studies

• Archaeology

• History

• Cultural Studies

• Literature

• Philosophy

• Religion

• Language & Linguistics

• History of Art & Architecture
  
  

Description:
This department reflects on the cultural, historical, and intellectual developments that shape society. Research in these fields provides critical insights into human culture, past and present, and fosters a deeper understanding of the world’s diverse traditions and experiences, promoting inclusivity and mutual respect across cultural boundaries.

3. Business, Economics & Management

• Business

• Finance and Accounting

• Management

• Economics

• Operational Research

• Risk Management

• International Business

• Entrepreneurship

• Marketing

• Human Resource Management

• Supply Chain Management

• Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)

• Organizational Behavior

• Innovation and Technology Management

• Strategic Management

• Sustainability in Business

• Business Ethics

• Global Business and Trade

• Investment and Asset Management

• Behavioral Economics

• Public Administration and Policy

• Corporate Governance

• Leadership Studies

• Financial Risk Management

• E-commerce and Digital Transformation

Description:
This department covers a broad range of topics that are crucial for the advancement of business practices and economic growth. Research in this category focuses on strategic decision-making, organizational effectiveness, and innovation within business environments. It includes studies on entrepreneurship, the role of marketing in business success, human resource management, and the integration of technology in business processes. Topics related to sustainability in business, corporate governance, and business ethics examine how businesses can contribute to societal good while remaining competitive in global markets. The journal also encourages research in behavioral economics and financial risk management that helps businesses make informed decisions in uncertain environments. Additionally, contributions on e-commerce, digital transformation, and international trade reflect the evolving landscape of business practices in a rapidly changing technological and global economic context. 

4. Health & Medical Humanities

• Health and Medical Humanities

• Health Policy & Services
  
  

Description:
This section highlights the intersection of health, medicine, and the humanities, exploring the human dimensions of healthcare. It includes research on medical ethics, public health policies, and strategies to improve access to healthcare, aiming to promote well-being and social justice in health systems.

5. Environmental & Sustainability Studies

• Environmental Studies

• Sustainability Science

• Climate Change and Resilience

• Green Economy

• Energy Policy and Transition

• Environmental Ethics

• Ecological Economics

• Environmental Governance

• Environmental Sociology

• Environmental Psychology

• Sustainable Urban Development

• Natural Resource Management

• Agricultural and Rural Development

• Environmental Education

• Environmental Justice

• Circular Economy

• Corporate Environmental Responsibility

• Science, Technology & Society (STS)

• Disaster Risk Reduction and Management

• Water Resource Management

• Waste Management and Recycling

• Sustainable Transportation

• Environmental Law and Policy

• Biodiversity and Conservation Studies

• Indigenous Knowledge and Sustainability

• Environmental Communication

Description:
This department covers critical interdisciplinary research on the interactions between humans and their natural environment. Contributions must be interdisciplinary, drawing on methods, theories, and perspectives from multiple fields to address complex environmental and sustainability challenges. The journal welcomes studies that integrate insights from social sciences, natural sciences, engineering, policy studies, and humanities to create holistic solutions for contemporary environmental issues.

Research topics span across climate adaptation and mitigation, green economy transitions, renewable energy adoption, and ecological resilience. Studies on environmental governance, law, and justice examine institutional and legal mechanisms for environmental protection, while environmental sociology and psychology explore how human behavior and societal norms influence sustainability practices. Contributions also welcome in the areas of corporate environmental responsibility, circular economy practices, and sustainable urban development, reflecting the journal’s commitment to Academics for a Better Society.

The journal encourages interdisciplinary research that explores the interconnectedness of science, policy, technology, and society, seeking solutions that foster environmental sustainability while addressing social equity and economic viability. Topics related to disaster risk management, water resource management, and sustainable transportation are particularly relevant as global communities strive to manage finite resources and adapt to changing environmental conditions.

6. Education & Information Sciences

• Education

• Information Science & Library Science

• Digital Humanities
  
  

Description:
This area explores how educational practices and information systems can contribute to building an informed and equitable society. Research here aims to improve teaching, learning, and the dissemination of knowledge, as well as the integration of technology in education to bridge gaps in access and opportunity.

7. Media & Communication Studies

• Communication

• Media Studies

Description:
In this section, the journal publishes research on how media and communication influence society. Topics include the role of media in shaping public opinion, fostering social change, and addressing global challenges through new communication technologies. Contributions aim to enhance social understanding and drive awareness of important societal issues.

8. Law & Ethics

• Law

• Ethics

• Business Ethics
  
  

Description:
This area examines how laws and ethical frameworks shape societal norms and human rights. Research here addresses legal reforms, social justice, and the ethical considerations of policies and technologies, aiming to promote fairness, accountability, and human dignity in the legal system.

9. Hospitality, Tourism & Leisure

• Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism

Description:
Research in this category explores the socio-economic impact of tourism and leisure activities. Studies focus on how tourism can contribute to sustainable development, promote cross-cultural understanding, and improve social cohesion, while also addressing challenges like environmental impact and local community well-being.

10. Technology, Innovation & Society

• Innovation Studies

• Digital Transformation

• Artificial Intelligence (AI)

• Blockchain Technology

• Cybersecurity and Privacy

• Big Data and Data Analytics

• Internet of Things (IoT)

• Smart Cities and Urban Innovation

• Digital Economy

• Fintech and Financial Technologies

• E-Government and Digital Governance

• Technology and Social Change

• Technology Adoption and Diffusion

• Human-Computer Interaction (HCI)

• Robotics and Automation

• Digital Platforms and Business Models

• Digital Marketing and E-Commerce

• Sustainable Technologies

• Tech Ethics and Responsibility

• Social Media and Society

• Technology for Development (Tech4Dev)

• Technology and Education (EdTech)

• Creative Industries and Innovation

• Regulation and Policy of Emerging Technologies

• Technological Unemployment and Future of Work

• Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare

• Ethical AI and Responsible Innovation

• Digital Divide and Access to Technology

• Technology, Innovation, and Global Inequality

Description:
This department publishes research on the societal impacts of technology, innovation, and digital transformation. It explores how technological advancements can foster social change, improve governance, and create new opportunities for inclusive development, while considering the ethical and societal implications of technological progress.

The Technology, Innovation & Society department explores the profound impact that technological advancements and innovations have on societies, economies, and individuals. Contributions in this area must be interdisciplinary, bridging fields such as engineering, economics, social sciences, policy studies, and humanities, to understand the complex dynamics between technology and society.

Research in this area focuses on how technological innovation drives societal progress while addressing challenges related to equity, sustainability, and governance. Topics such as digital transformation, AI, blockchain, and fintech examine how new technologies shape industries, economies, and daily life. The journal encourages contributions that explore the ethical implications of emerging technologies, including AI ethics, privacy concerns, and the social impact of digital platforms and social media.

Innovation studies and digital economy research will explore how new business models and digital entrepreneurship are reshaping industries, as well as the role of technology in development (Tech4Dev) to bridge gaps in underdeveloped regions. The journal also welcomes studies on smart cities, sustainable technologies, and technological solutions for climate change, which aim to contribute to global sustainability and environmental preservation.

Research on technology adoption, diffusion processes, and the future of work provides insight into the evolving relationship between humans and machines, especially in areas like automation, robotics, and technology’s impact on employment. The journal is particularly interested in studies that investigate the digital divide, ensuring that technology and innovation reach all sectors of society, regardless of income or geography.

Technology regulation, including policy and government intervention, is another key area of interest. The journal encourages research that analyzes the role of governance in managing emerging technologies and ensuring their ethical and equitable use across the globe.

Editorial Board

The Editorial Board of Journal of Human-Social Nexus plays a crucial role in maintaining the journal’s commitment to high-quality, rigorous research. The board is composed of distinguished scholars, experts, and professionals from diverse fields within the humanities and social sciences. Each board member brings extensive knowledge, expertise, and a commitment to advancing academic research.

The board is responsible for overseeing the editorial process, making final decisions on manuscript acceptance, and ensuring that the journal adheres to the highest standards of academic integrity, ethics, and quality. Members of the Editorial Board contribute significantly to shaping the journal’s strategic direction, editorial policies, and the types of research topics to be covered.

The Editorial Board will be updated soon to reflect the growing range of topics and interdisciplinary research that the journal will publish. As we continue to expand and adapt to new trends and challenges in the humanities and social sciences, we will recruit additional board members who are experts in emerging areas of research. This ensures that the journal stays at the forefront of academic discussions and remains a valuable resource for scholars worldwide.

A Prospective Editorial Board Member

We are always looking for prospective members who are leaders in their fields and passionate about contributing to the academic community. If you are interested in joining our Editorial Board, please feel free to contact us. We welcome scholars who:

• Have a strong academic background and an established record of research and publication in the humanities and social sciences.

• Are committed to upholding high standards of academic integrity, quality, and ethics in the publication process.

• Have the ability to critically evaluate research manuscripts and provide constructive feedback to authors.

• Are enthusiastic about contributing to the development of the journal and helping shape its editorial policies.

If you are interested in becoming a part of our dynamic Editorial Board, please reach out via the following link for further details on the nomination process.

We look forward to collaborating with an expanding network of respected scholars and academics who share our vision of advancing knowledge for a better society.

Thank you for considering Journal of Human-Social Nexus for your research publication. Below are the detailed guidelines for submitting your manuscript to ensure smooth and efficient processing of your work. 

1. General Submission Requirements

Originality:

• Manuscripts submitted to ABS Humanities and Social Sciences Letters must be original. The work should not have been published elsewhere or be under consideration for publication in any other journal.

• Plagiarism checks will be conducted, and any manuscript found to have plagiarized content will be rejected. Ensure proper citation of all sources used in your work.
  
  

Peer Review:

• All submitted manuscripts undergo a double-blind peer review process, ensuring that both authors and reviewers remain anonymous. Authors should be prepared to make revisions based on the feedback from reviewers.

• The aim of the peer review process is to evaluate the originality, methodology, clarity, and relevance of the research, as well as to enhance the quality of the manuscript.
  
  

Language:

• Manuscripts should be written in clear and concise English. Non-native English speakers are encouraged to have their work professionally edited before submission to ensure clarity and fluency.
  
  

Length:

• Research Articles: Maximum of 4000 words, including references, tables, and figures.

• Letters to the Editor: Maximum of 1000 words, with concise points addressing key issues or commenting on previously published work.

• Review Articles: Maximum of 6000 words. Review articles should provide a comprehensive analysis of existing literature on a specific topic or theme.

• Abstract: All manuscripts should include a brief abstract of up to 100 words, summarizing the research question, methodology, findings, and implications.
  
  

2. Manuscript Structure

Title:

• The title should clearly convey the topic of the research in a concise manner.

• It should be descriptive and engaging, providing enough information to give the reader an immediate understanding of the research focus.
  
  

Abstract:

• Word limit: 100 words.

• The abstract should summarize the entire study in a brief format, highlighting the research question, methods, key findings, and implications of the study.

• Avoid using figures, tables, or extensive references in the abstract.
  
  

Keywords:

• Provide 4-6 keywords that are relevant to the research topic.

• These keywords will help index your manuscript for search engines and databases. Choose keywords that are widely recognized in your field and relevant to your study.
  
  

Introduction:

• The introduction should clearly state the research problem and the objectives of the study.

• This section should outline why the topic is significant, introduce relevant background literature, and identify research gaps the study aims to address.

• The research question should be framed clearly.
  
  

Literature Review:

• Provide a thorough review of relevant theories and previous research on the topic.

• Discuss the strengths and limitations of existing studies, identify gaps in the literature, and clearly justify how your study contributes to the field.

• The literature review should lay the groundwork for your research question and methodology.
  
  

Methodology:

• Clearly describe the research design, data collection methods, and analysis techniques used.

• For quantitative studies, provide information on statistical models, software, sampling methods, and data sources.

• For qualitative studies, explain the data collection process (e.g., interviews, focus groups), and the analysis approach (e.g., thematic analysis, grounded theory).

• Justify why your chosen methods are appropriate for addressing the research questions.
  
  

Results:

• Present the findings clearly and objectively.

• Use tables, figures, and charts to summarize key results, making sure they are clearly labeled and referenced in the text.

• Report statistical results (e.g., p-values, effect sizes) in a manner consistent with the standards of your discipline.
  
  

Discussion and Conclusion:

• The discussion should interpret the results in the context of the research question, theoretical framework, and existing literature.

• Address the implications of your findings for theory, practice, and future research.

• Highlight any limitations of your study and suggest potential directions for future research.

• Conclude with a summary of the key findings and their broader implications.
  
  

References:

• All references must follow APA (7th edition) style. Ensure that every source cited in the manuscript appears in the reference list and that all references are properly formatted.

• Provide full citation details, including the author(s), year, title, journal name, volume, pages, and DOI (where available).
  
  

Acknowledgments:

• If applicable, thank those who have contributed to the study but do not meet the authorship criteria. This may include funding agencies, colleagues who provided feedback, or institutions that provided data or resources.

3. Figures and Tables

• Placement: Figures and tables should be integrated into the manuscript at appropriate points rather than at the end.

• Quality: Ensure that all images, graphs, and figures are high resolution and easy to interpret. Text on figures should be legible.

• Numbering: Number figures and tables consecutively (e.g., Table 1, Figure 1) and refer to them in the text (e.g., “As shown in Table 1...”).

• Legends and Captions: Each figure and table should have a brief and informative caption that describes its content.
  
  

4. Ethical Considerations

Consent:

• If the study involves human participants, ensure that informed consent has been obtained from participants, and include a statement confirming this in your manuscript.

• If the research involves sensitive data, ensure that participants' privacy is protected.
  
  

Conflict of Interest:

• Authors must disclose any potential conflicts of interest in a separate section of the manuscript. This includes financial, personal, or professional relationships that could influence the study.
  
  

Ethical Approval:

• If required, provide a statement confirming that the study has received ethical approval from the relevant institutional review board (IRB) or ethics committee.

• Provide the name of the ethics board and the approval number if applicable.
  
  

5. Submission Process

Initial Submission:

• Submit your manuscript via the journal's online submission portal as a single Word or PDF document.

• Ensure that your manuscript includes all required sections: title, abstract, keywords, main body (including literature review, methodology, results, and discussion), references, and acknowledgments.
  
  

Cover Letter:

• A cover letter is required for all submissions. In your letter, state that the manuscript is original and has not been submitted elsewhere.

• Provide a brief summary of the manuscript, highlighting its significance and contributions to the field.
  
  

Peer Review:

• Once submitted, your manuscript will undergo a double-blind peer review process.

• The corresponding author will be notified of the reviewer's comments, and you may be asked to revise your manuscript accordingly.
  
  

Revisions:

• If revisions are requested, you must submit a revised version of your manuscript, along with a response to reviewers.

• Address each reviewer’s comment point-by-point in your response letter.

6. Copyright and Licensing

Copyright:

• Upon acceptance, copyright for the manuscript will transfer to ABS Humanities and Social Sciences Letters.

• Authors will receive a signed copyright transfer agreement upon acceptance.
  
  

Open Access:

• ABS Humanities and Social Sciences Letters is a fully open access journal. This means that all articles are freely available to readers worldwide without any subscription or access barriers.

• All published articles will be made available under a Creative Commons (CC) license, allowing for broad sharing and distribution.
  
  

Article Processing Charges (APC):

• The Article Processing Charge (APC) for each accepted article is $1200. This fee covers the costs of peer review, copyediting, typesetting, and long-term archiving, as well as the open-access publication of the article.

• Important Notice: The APC is fully waived until December 2028, meaning that authors can publish their articles without incurring the APC fee during this period.
  
  

Waiver Period:

• The APC waiver is available for all accepted articles submitted before December 2028. After this date, the APC fee of $1200 will apply for publication.

7. Useful Links and Resources

• Submission Portal: Updated soon

• APA Style Guide: Updated soon 

• Plagiarism Check: Manuscripts should be checked for plagiarism using a plagiarism detection tool before submission.
  
  

8. Additional Information

Expected Timeline:

• Manuscripts typically undergo a 4-6 week review process. Revisions may extend this timeline.

Feedback:

• Authors will receive constructive feedback from peer reviewers. Manuscripts may require revisions to meet the publication standards.

Post-Publication:

• Once published, articles will be available open access, ensuring wide readership and visibility.

Contact Information:

For any queries, please contact the editorial team at:

Email: publisher@absresearchacademy.com 

Website: Updated soon

Ethics in Publishing

At Journal of Human-Social Nexus, we are committed to the highest ethical standards in the publication process. Authors must follow ethical guidelines and standards as outlined in ABS Publisher's Publishing Ethics Policy, which emphasizes the importance of transparency, integrity, and responsibility in academic research.

Submission Declaration

By submitting a manuscript to Journal of Human-Social Nexus, authors implicitly confirm the following:

1. Originality: The work described has not been published previously except in the form of a preprint, abstract, published lecture, academic thesis, or registered report. For more details, refer to our policy on multiple, redundant, or concurrent publication.

2. No Concurrent Submissions: The manuscript is not under consideration for publication elsewhere.

3. Approval by Authors: The article's publication has been approved by all authors and, where applicable, by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out.

4. Exclusive Publication: If accepted, the article will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or any other language, including electronically, without the written consent of the copyright-holder.

5. Compliance with Policies: To verify compliance with our journal publishing policies, we may check your manuscript with our screening tools.
   
   

Authorship

All authors must have made substantial contributions to the study in the following areas:

1. Conception and Design: Contributions to the study’s conception, data acquisition, or analysis and interpretation of data.

2. Drafting and Revising: Drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content.

3. Approval of Final Version: Final approval of the version to be submitted.

Authors must appoint a corresponding author to communicate with the journal during the editorial process. All authors must be accountable for all aspects of the work to ensure any questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately addressed.

Changes to Authorship

ABS Humanities and Social Sciences Letters generally does not consider changes to authorship once a manuscript has been submitted. Authors should carefully consider the authorship list and order at the time of original submission.

• Addition, Deletion, or Rearrangement: Any changes to the authorship list (addition, deletion, or rearrangement) should only be made before the manuscript’s acceptance and must be approved by the journal editor.

• Requests: Authorship change requests should be made by the corresponding author using the official authorship change form and must include written confirmation from all authors, including any authors being added or removed, that they agree with the change.

• Post-Acceptance Changes: Changes to authorship after acceptance will only be considered in exceptional circumstances and may result in a corrigendum if the manuscript has already been published.

• Unauthorised Changes: Any unauthorized changes to authorship may lead to the rejection of the article or retraction if the article has already been published.
  
  

Declaration of Competing Interests

All authors must disclose any financial and personal relationships that could influence or bias their work. Potential conflicts of interest include:

• Employment or consultancy

• Stock ownership

• Honoraria or paid expert testimony

• Patent applications or registrations

• Grants or any other funding
  
  

Authors should complete the declaration tool and upload the document in .doc/.docx format during the submission process. If no conflicts of interest exist, authors must select the option, "I have nothing to declare".

Funding Sources

Authors must disclose all funding sources that supported the conduct of the research and/or the preparation of the article. If no funding was received, authors should state:

• This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Funding sources should be listed in the following format:

• Funding: This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health [grant numbers xxxx, yyyy]; the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA [grant number zzzz].
  
  

Declaration of Generative AI in Scientific Writing

Authors must declare the use of generative AI in the writing process at the time of submission. The declaration pertains only to the use of AI tools for writing, not for analyzing or drawing insights from data.

• Allowed Use: Generative AI and AI-assisted tools should only be used to improve the readability and language of the manuscript.

• Human Oversight: AI tools must be used under human oversight and control. Authors must review and edit the content generated by AI, as it can produce outputs that are incorrect, incomplete, or biased.

• Responsibility: Authors are ultimately responsible for the content of the manuscript and must take full accountability for its accuracy.
  
  

Example Statement:
During the preparation of this work, the author(s) used [NAME TOOL/SERVICE] to improve the readability and language of the manuscript. After using this tool/service, the author(s) reviewed and edited the content as needed and take(s) full responsibility for the content of the published article.

• No Citation of AI Tools: AI tools should not be listed or cited as authors or co-authors. Only humans can be assigned authorship duties and responsibilities.

If no AI was used in writing, authors do not need to include this declaration.

Generative AI Use in Review and Editorial Process

To protect authors’ rights and ensure the confidentiality of research, Journal of Human-Social Nexus does not allow the use of generative AI tools (such as ChatGPT) by reviewers or editors in the peer review process. We are currently evaluating AI tools that align with ethical guidelines and may revise this policy in the future.

At Journal of Human-Social Nexus, we are committed to maintaining the highest standards of academic integrity, transparency, and quality throughout the editorial and publishing process. Our Editorial Policies are designed to ensure fairness, ethical conduct, and the production of high-quality research that advances knowledge in the humanities and social sciences. The following policies guide the actions of the editorial team, authors, and reviewers to foster a professional and responsible publishing environment.

1. Editorial Independence

• Editorial Independence: The editorial team operates independently of external influence, including the publisher, authors, and advertisers. The editorial decisions made by the editorial board and editor-in-chief are based solely on the academic merit of the manuscript, ensuring that all manuscripts are evaluated objectively and fairly.

• Conflict of Interest: Editors must disclose any conflicts of interest and recuse themselves from reviewing or making decisions on manuscripts where a potential conflict exists. This includes personal, financial, or professional relationships that could bias their judgment.

2. Manuscript Submission and Peer Review

• Submission Process: Manuscripts must be submitted through the journal’s online submission system. Authors are required to follow the Author Guidelines and submit the necessary documents, including a cover letter, manuscript, and supplementary materials (e.g., figures, tables, supplementary files).

• Peer Review: ABS Humanities and Social Sciences Letters employs a double-blind peer review system. Both the authors’ and reviewers’ identities are kept confidential to eliminate bias.

  • Manuscripts are sent to two independent experts in the relevant field for review.

  • Reviewers assess the manuscript’s originality, relevance, methodology, and contribution to the field, providing detailed feedback.

  • Based on reviewer comments, the editorial team makes the final decision on whether the manuscript is accepted, revised, or rejected.

• Review Timeliness: The typical time for review is 4-6 weeks. Reviewers are expected to complete their reviews within the specified timeframe to avoid delays in the publication process.

3. Decision-Making Process

• Acceptance Criteria: Manuscripts are assessed based on their scientific quality, clarity, and contribution to the field. Manuscripts must present original research that advances knowledge in the humanities and social sciences.

  • Manuscripts that meet these criteria will be considered for acceptance.

  • If the manuscript requires minor or major revisions, authors will be asked to address reviewer comments and resubmit the revised manuscript.
    
    

• Rejection: Manuscripts may be rejected if they do not meet the journal’s scope, quality, or academic standards. Rejection may also occur if:

  • The manuscript contains significant ethical concerns, including plagiarism or data falsification.

  • The manuscript is too similar to previous work or lacks originality.

  • The manuscript does not sufficiently contribute to the existing literature.

4. Publication Ethics

• Adherence to Ethical Guidelines: Journal of Human-Social Nexus adheres to the ethical guidelines set by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). We are committed to publishing research that meets the highest ethical standards, including proper citation of sources, adherence to ethical research practices, and transparency in research methodology.

  • Plagiarism: Manuscripts are checked for plagiarism using plagiarism detection software. Plagiarism or self-plagiarism will result in immediate rejection.

  • Fabrication and Falsification: Authors must not fabricate or manipulate data, images, or results. Manuscripts containing fabricated or falsified data will be rejected.

  • Ethics Approval: Research involving human participants or animals must have received ethical approval from the relevant institutional review board (IRB) or ethics committee. Authors must include a statement of ethics approval and informed consent (if applicable).

  • Conflict of Interest: Authors, reviewers, and editors must disclose any conflicts of interest that may affect the impartiality of the review and decision-making process.

5. Authorship and Acknowledgments

• Authorship: All authors must have made substantial contributions to the manuscript’s conception, design, data acquisition, or analysis. Only those who meet the authorship criteria should be listed as authors, and all authors must approve the final version of the manuscript before submission.

  • Corresponding Author: The corresponding author is responsible for communicating with the journal during the editorial process and handling all communication between the authors and the editorial team.

• Acknowledgments: Authors must acknowledge any individuals, organizations, or funding bodies that have supported the research. This includes acknowledging financial support, technical assistance, or intellectual contributions that do not meet the authorship criteria.
  
  

6. Handling of Plagiarism and Ethical Violations

• Plagiarism Detection: Journal of Human-Social Nexus uses plagiarism detection software to ensure that all manuscripts are free from plagiarism and self-plagiarism. If plagiarism is detected, the manuscript will be rejected, and the author(s) will be informed.

• Duplicate Publication: Manuscripts that have been published elsewhere, in whole or in part, or are under simultaneous submission to another journal, will be rejected.

• Post-Publication Misconduct: If misconduct is detected after publication, such as data falsification or ethical violations, the article will be retracted or corrected, and the issue will be communicated with the wider community.

  • In cases of severe misconduct, the authors may be banned from submitting future manuscripts to the journal.
    
    

7. Retractions and Corrections

• Retractions: Articles may be retracted if they contain major errors, misconduct, or ethical violations (e.g., data fabrication, plagiarism). A retraction notice will be published, explaining the reason for the retraction and ensuring transparency.

• Corrections: Articles with minor errors (e.g., typographical mistakes, citation issues) will be corrected through an erratum or corrigendum. A notice will be issued to inform readers of the correction.
  
  

8. Open Access and Copyright

• Open Access: All articles in Journal of Human-Social Nexus are published under a Creative Commons (CC) license to ensure unrestricted access to the global academic community.

  • Authors retain copyright over their work, but they must grant the journal the right to publish and distribute the article under the open access model.

• Article Processing Charge (APC): The journal charges an APC of $1200 for each accepted article, which helps cover the costs of editorial, peer review, and publication services. The APC is waived until December 2028 for all accepted articles.
  
  

9. Timeliness and Publication Frequency

• Publication Frequency: Journal of Human-Social Nexus publishes four issues per year (March, June, September, December) under a continuous publication model. Articles are published online first as soon as they are ready, and later compiled into quarterly issues.

• Timely Publishing: We aim to complete the review process and publish articles promptly. The typical timeline from submission to publication is 8-10 weeks, with revisions contributing to a longer process.
  
  

10. Appeals Process

• Appeals Against Editorial Decisions: If authors disagree with an editorial decision (e.g., rejection or major revisions), they may appeal to the editor-in-chief. Authors must submit a written appeal, explaining the reasons for the appeal and any supporting arguments.

• Fair Consideration: The editor-in-chief will review the appeal and consult the editorial board if needed. A final decision will be made based on the manuscript’s academic merit and compliance with the journal’s standards.

11. Transparency and Accountability

• Transparency: Journal of Human-Social Nexus aims for complete transparency in all stages of the editorial and publishing process. Authors, reviewers, and editors must adhere to the highest ethical standards, ensuring fair and unbiased decisions.

• Accountability: All parties involved in the publishing process are accountable for upholding the integrity of the journal. Authors, reviewers, and editors are responsible for ensuring that research is conducted ethically and that all published work is accurate and reliable.

The Editorial Policies of Journal of Human-Social Nexus are designed to maintain academic integrity, transparency, and fairness throughout the editorial and publishing process. By following these policies, the journal ensures that it remains a trusted platform for high-quality, ethical research in the humanities and social sciences, contributing to the global academic community.

Journal of Human-Social Nexus is committed to ensuring the highest standards of academic rigor in the publication of research. Our peer review process is designed to provide constructive feedback to authors and maintain the integrity of the research published in our journal. Below is a detailed overview of our peer review policy, which reflects our commitment to transparency, fairness, and quality.

1. Overview of the Peer Review Process

We follow a double-blind peer review process, meaning both the authors and the reviewers remain anonymous throughout the review process. This system aims to eliminate biases based on the authors' identities and focuses entirely on the quality and substance of the manuscript.

The peer review process helps ensure that the work published in Journal of Human-Social Nexus is of the highest academic standard, by subjecting it to independent, expert evaluation. Reviewers are selected based on their expertise in the subject matter of the manuscript.

2. Submission and Initial Review

Upon submission, the manuscript is first assessed by the Editorial Team to ensure it aligns with the journal's scope, guidelines, and quality standards. If the manuscript passes the initial review:

• The corresponding author is informed that the manuscript will proceed to the peer review stage.

• Manuscripts that do not meet the basic requirements of the journal (e.g., formatting issues, lack of originality, or relevance to the journal's scope) may be rejected at this stage.
  
  

3. Double-Blind Peer Review Process

Reviewer Selection

• Editorial Team: The editorial team assigns the manuscript to at least two independent reviewers who are experts in the field relevant to the manuscript. In some cases, additional reviewers may be selected if needed.

• Reviewer Criteria: Reviewers are selected based on their expertise in the subject area of the manuscript. They are chosen to provide an objective and fair assessment of the manuscript's contribution to the field.

• Anonymity: In the double-blind process, both the authors and reviewers remain anonymous. Reviewers are not informed of the authors' identities, and authors are not aware of the identities of the reviewers.
  
  

Review Process

• Reviewer's Role: The reviewers are responsible for evaluating the manuscript based on its originality, clarity, methodology, relevance, and contribution to the field. They are asked to assess:

  • The significance of the research question.

  • The novelty and originality of the research.

  • The soundness of the methodology and data analysis.

  • The clarity and logical flow of the manuscript.

  • The quality and relevance of the literature review and references.

  • The potential impact and practical implications of the study.
    
    

• Timeliness: Reviewers are expected to complete their reviews within 4-6 weeks from receiving the manuscript. If additional time is needed, reviewers should notify the editorial team in advance.

• Constructive Feedback: Reviewers are encouraged to provide constructive feedback that will help the authors improve their manuscript. Comments should be objective and professional, focusing on the content rather than personal opinions.
  
  

Types of Review Decisions

After completing their review, the reviewers will recommend one of the following decisions:

• Accept: The manuscript is deemed suitable for publication without the need for major revisions.

• Minor Revisions: The manuscript is suitable for publication but requires minor revisions before acceptance.

• Major Revisions: Significant changes are needed before the manuscript can be considered for publication.

• Reject: The manuscript is not suitable for publication in its current form.
  
  

4. Author's Response and Revision

Revisions and Resubmission

• If the manuscript requires revisions (minor or major), the authors are expected to address the reviewers' comments and submit a revised manuscript within a specified timeframe.

• The corresponding author is expected to submit a point-by-point response to each reviewer comment, explaining how the revisions were made or justifying why certain suggestions were not implemented.

• Resubmission: After revisions, the manuscript will be re-assessed by the editorial team, and in some cases, it may be sent back to the original reviewers for a second round of review.
  
  

Acceptance

• If the revisions meet the reviewers' and editors' expectations, the manuscript will be accepted for publication.

• Once accepted, the manuscript will undergo copyediting and formatting for publication.
  
  

5. Ethical Considerations in the Peer Review Process

Confidentiality

• All materials submitted for review are treated as confidential documents. Reviewers must not disclose, discuss, or use any information from the manuscript before it is published.
  
  

Conflicts of Interest

• Reviewers must disclose any potential conflict of interest that could influence their review. Conflicts of interest may arise from personal relationships with the authors or financial interests in the subject matter.

• If a conflict of interest exists, the reviewer is expected to decline the invitation to review the manuscript.
  
  

Bias

• Reviewers are expected to evaluate the manuscript based solely on the academic merit and scientific integrity of the work, not influenced by the author's nationality, institution, or personal characteristics.

6. Post-Publication Peer Review

Corrections and Retractions

• If errors or ethical concerns are discovered after publication, the editorial team will address the issue as per ABS Publisher’s Post-Publication Policy.

• The manuscript may be corrected or retracted if substantial issues are identified, such as ethical violations or errors affecting the findings of the research.
  
  

Erratum and Corrigendum

• In the case of minor errors identified after publication (e.g., typographical or referencing mistakes), a corrigendum will be issued.

• In the case of more significant errors (such as data manipulation or plagiarism), a retraction will be published.
  
  

7. Transparency and Accountability

• Transparency: Journal of Human-Social Nexus is committed to maintaining transparency in the peer review process. Authors, reviewers, and editors must uphold the principles of integrity and impartiality.

• Feedback: Authors are encouraged to engage with the feedback they receive during the review process and revise their manuscripts accordingly, improving the overall quality of their research.
  
  

8. Reviewer Guidelines

Reviewers should adhere to the following guidelines to ensure a high-quality and fair review process:

• Thoroughness: Provide a detailed evaluation, focusing on strengths and weaknesses.

• Clarity: Make sure the review is clear, well-organized, and free from jargon.

• Constructive Criticism: Offer suggestions that can improve the manuscript. Focus on providing value through constructive feedback.

• Confidentiality: Maintain confidentiality throughout the review process and avoid discussing the manuscript with others.
  
  

9. Appeals Process

In the event that an author disagrees with the decision made by the reviewers or the editorial team, they may appeal the decision. The appeal should be directed to the editor-in-chief, providing a rationale for why the manuscript should be reconsidered. The editorial team will review the appeal and decide whether to proceed with further review.

Journal of Human-Social Nexus is committed to providing a robust and transparent peer review process to ensure the integrity and quality of published research. Through this process, we strive to uphold the academic standards and foster a collaborative environment between authors, reviewers, and editors to contribute to the body of knowledge in the humanities and social sciences. 

Journal of Human-Social Nexus adheres to a rigorous plagiarism policy to maintain the integrity and quality of the research we publish. Our goal is to ensure that all work published in the journal is original, authentic, and properly attributed to the authors. The journal follows strict guidelines for detecting and managing plagiarism, both before and after publication, in line with ethical academic practices.

1. Definition of Plagiarism

Plagiarism is defined as the unauthorized use or representation of another person's ideas, research, or words as one’s own. This includes, but is not limited to:

• Copying text from any source without proper citation.

• Paraphrasing without attribution to the original author or source.

• Reproducing images, graphs, or tables from other works without appropriate credit.

• Self-plagiarism, where authors reuse their own previously published work without proper acknowledgment or without seeking approval for republishing.

Plagiarism can occur in any part of a manuscript, including the introduction, literature review, methodology, results, and conclusion sections.

2. Plagiarism Detection and Threshold

Journal of Human-Social Nexus uses plagiarism detection software to screen all submitted manuscripts for potential plagiarism. This helps ensure that the work published in our journal is original and properly cited.

• Plagiarism Threshold: Manuscripts must have plagiarism levels below 15% as determined by plagiarism detection tools (such as Turnitin, iThenticate, or others).

• Submission Requirements: Authors are required to check their manuscripts for plagiarism before submission using reliable plagiarism detection tools. We strongly recommend that authors conduct this check to avoid delays or rejection of their submissions.

• Rejection of Manuscripts: Manuscripts that exceed the 15% plagiarism threshold will be rejected. Authors may be asked to revise their manuscript, properly cite sources, and resubmit it for re-evaluation.
  
  

3. Handling of Plagiarism Cases

Before Publication:

• If plagiarism is detected during the review process, the manuscript will be immediately rejected. The corresponding author will be informed, and the journal may ask for clarification or further explanation regarding the plagiarism found.

• If the author fails to appropriately address the plagiarism or refuses to correct the issues, the manuscript will be permanently withdrawn from consideration for publication in ABS Humanities and Social Sciences Letters.
  
  

After Publication:

• If plagiarism is identified after an article has been published, Journal of Human-Social Nexus will follow a strict protocol to handle the situation.

  • The article will be retracted or corrected if plagiarism is significant and cannot be resolved through a corrigendum.

  • A formal retraction notice will be published, and the article will be removed from the journal’s online platform.

  • In the case of minor plagiarism (e.g., incorrect citation), the article may be corrected with an appropriate erratum.
    
    

4. Self-Plagiarism

Self-plagiarism occurs when authors reuse portions of their own previously published work without proper citation or acknowledgment. Journal of Human-Social Nexus considers self-plagiarism to be unethical and will reject any manuscript that contains substantial reused text or data from the authors’ earlier work without proper citation.

If authors wish to reuse parts of their previous publications, they must:

1. Cite the original work properly in the manuscript.

2. Obtain written consent from the editor-in-chief to reuse content from earlier publications if required.
   
   

5. Ethical Guidelines for Authors

To avoid plagiarism, authors must adhere to the following ethical guidelines:

• Always attribute the original source when directly quoting, paraphrasing, or summarizing someone else's work.

• Ensure that all references, data, figures, and images used in the manuscript are properly cited and that permissions are obtained for any material not owned by the author.

• Avoid copying content from other sources without citation, including texts from websites, books, articles, or previously published papers, especially if it is not in the public domain or requires special permission.

• Provide proper citation for published theses, lectures, conferences, or any other form of prior publication.
  
  

6. Responsibilities of Reviewers and Editors

Reviewers:
Reviewers should be vigilant in checking for plagiarism during the peer review process. If a reviewer suspects that a manuscript contains plagiarized material, they should notify the editorial team immediately.

Editors:
The editorial team at Journal of Human-Social Nexus is responsible for ensuring that manuscripts adhere to the journal’s plagiarism policy. Editors will:

• Review plagiarism reports from plagiarism detection software.

• Communicate with authors regarding any issues of plagiarism identified during the review process.

• Make final decisions on whether to reject or accept a manuscript based on plagiarism concerns.
  
  

7. Penalties for Plagiarism

Any manuscript found to contain significant plagiarism will be handled as follows:

• Immediate Rejection: Manuscripts that exceed the 15% plagiarism threshold will be rejected.

• Rejection from the Journal: Authors found committing plagiarism will be permanently disqualified from submitting to Journal of Human-Social Nexus.

• Public Notice: In case of post-publication plagiarism, a retraction notice will be published, and the article will be removed from the journal.

We take plagiarism very seriously and have a zero-tolerance policy for any form of academic dishonesty.

8. Appeals Process

If an author disagrees with the plagiarism determination, they may appeal the decision. Authors should submit their appeal to the editorial team with a detailed explanation and any supporting documentation. The editorial team will review the appeal and make a final decision, which may include:

• Allowing the manuscript to proceed with necessary revisions.

• Rejection of the manuscript if the appeal is unsuccessful.

Journal of Human-Social Nexus is committed to maintaining the highest ethical standards in publishing. Our plagiarism policy ensures that all research published is original, transparent, and properly attributed, upholding the integrity of the academic community. Authors are expected to adhere to these guidelines to ensure their work contributes positively to the body of scholarly knowledge.

The Editors of Journal of Human-Social Nexus play a critical role in ensuring the journal publishes high-quality, ethical, and relevant research. These guidelines are designed to support editors in their responsibilities and help maintain the integrity and quality of the journal’s content. 

1. Editorial Responsibilities

Decision-Making:

• Editors are responsible for making final decisions on manuscripts after they have undergone the peer review process. Based on the reviewers' comments and their own assessments, editors will decide whether a manuscript is accepted, requires revisions, or is rejected.

• Decisions should be based on the quality of the research, the relevance to the journal’s scope, the clarity of the writing, and the contribution to the field. Manuscripts should not be rejected solely based on the author’s identity, institution, nationality, or any personal bias.

Fairness:

• Editors must ensure that all manuscripts are evaluated fairly, impartially, and based solely on their academic merit. Editors should not favor any submission based on personal, institutional, or professional relationships.

• Double-blind peer review must be adhered to, ensuring that neither the authors nor the reviewers know each other’s identities, which helps avoid biases in the review process.

Ethical Oversight:

• Editors must ensure that all submissions comply with the journal’s ethical standards. If a manuscript is found to involve unethical practices such as plagiarism, falsification of data, or ethical violations, it should be rejected immediately.

• Ethical guidelines should be followed, and editors should be familiar with the journal’s Plagiarism Policy, Conflict of Interest Policy, and Research Ethics.
  
  

2. Manuscript Review Process

Selecting Reviewers:

• Editors must select appropriate reviewers for each manuscript, based on their expertise in the subject matter and their ability to provide constructive and impartial feedback.

• Reviewers should be experts in the relevant field and should have no conflicts of interest regarding the manuscript. Editors are encouraged to select both established scholars and emerging experts to provide diverse perspectives.
  
  

Review Feedback:

• Editors must ensure that reviewers provide constructive, objective, and respectful feedback. Reviewers should offer specific recommendations for improvement and avoid personal comments that could be deemed inappropriate or biased.

• Editors should review the feedback from the reviewers and determine whether the manuscript requires minor revisions, major revisions, or rejection.
  
  

Timeliness:

• Editors are responsible for ensuring that the peer review process is completed in a timely manner. They must aim to provide authors with decisions on their manuscripts promptly, typically within 4-6 weeks of submission.

• If revisions are requested, editors should allow a reasonable timeframe for authors to make the necessary changes and resubmit the manuscript.
  
  

3. Conflict of Interest

Disclosure:

• Editors must disclose any conflict of interest they may have with a manuscript under consideration. If an editor has a conflict of interest, they should recuse themselves from handling the manuscript and assign it to another editor.

• Conflicts of interest may include personal relationships with the authors, financial interests, or professional connections that could influence the editorial decision.
  
  

Impartiality:

• Editors must ensure that the editorial process is free from bias. They must base decisions on the scientific and academic merits of the manuscript and not allow personal views or relationships to influence the process.
  
  

4. Ethical Oversight and Integrity

Plagiarism and Duplicate Publication:

• Editors are responsible for checking manuscripts for plagiarism using appropriate plagiarism detection tools. Manuscripts with high levels of plagiarism (over 15%) or duplicate content should be rejected immediately.

• Editors should ensure that authors properly attribute sources and avoid self-plagiarism.
  
  

Data Integrity:

• Editors should be vigilant about the integrity of the data presented in the manuscripts. If there are concerns about data manipulation or research ethics, editors must investigate the matter thoroughly, following the journal’s protocols.

• Misrepresentation of data or failure to disclose research methods, data sources, or conflicts of interest should lead to the manuscript being rejected or retracted if published.
  
  

5. Editorial Communication

With Authors:

• Editors must communicate clearly and professionally with authors at every stage of the editorial process. Authors should be informed of the editorial decision promptly, whether the manuscript is accepted, revised, or rejected.

• If revisions are required, editors should provide a clear summary of reviewer feedback, along with any additional comments or instructions for the authors.
  
  

With Reviewers:

• Editors must ensure that reviewers receive timely communication and are thanked for their valuable time and efforts.

• Reviewers must be reminded of their obligation to provide constructive and respectful feedback in a timely manner, in line with the journal’s standards.
  
  

With Editorial Board:

• Editors should consult with the Editorial Board for advice on contentious issues, or when they feel a second opinion is required to make an editorial decision.

• Regular meetings should be held to discuss the journal’s direction, policies, and any potential issues with manuscripts or reviewers.
  
  

6. Maintaining Transparency

Clear Editorial Decisions:

• Editorial decisions must be transparent and well-documented. Editors should ensure that decisions are communicated clearly to authors, with specific feedback that justifies the decision made.

• The editorial process should be transparent, with all involved parties (authors, reviewers, and editors) being aware of their roles and responsibilities.
  
  

Publications and Retractions:

• If a manuscript has been published and a serious error or ethical issue is identified post-publication, editors must take swift action, which may involve issuing a corrigendum or retraction.

• Editors should follow the journal’s retraction policy if significant ethical violations or academic misconduct are discovered after publication.

7. Editorial Policy Development

Journal Growth:

• Editors should be proactive in contributing to the growth and development of the journal, including fostering new research areas, broadening the scope, and attracting high-quality submissions.

• Editors should work collaboratively with the Editorial Board and Publisher to keep the journal relevant, timely, and in alignment with emerging trends and developments in the humanities and social sciences fields.

Regular Policy Review:

• Editors should periodically review the journal’s editorial policies to ensure they reflect current academic standards, ethical practices, and best practices in the scholarly publishing industry.
  
  

8. Editorial Independence

Autonomy in Decision-Making:

• Editors must maintain their editorial independence from external influences, including the journal’s publisher, authors, or other stakeholders. Decisions should always be made based on the manuscript’s academic merit and relevance to the journal’s scope.

• Editors should avoid conflicts of interest, political bias, or financial incentives when making editorial decisions.
  
  

9. Handling Appeals

Appeals Process:

• If an author disagrees with an editorial decision, they may submit an appeal to the editor-in-chief. Editors should provide a fair process for evaluating appeals and address any concerns raised by authors.

• The appeals process should be transparent, and authors should be informed of the final decision, with a clear explanation provided for any changes or actions taken.
  
  

The role of the editor is crucial in maintaining the integrity, quality, and credibility of Journal of Human-Social Nexus. By following these guidelines, editors ensure that the journal adheres to the highest academic standards and continues to contribute valuable knowledge to the field of humanities and social sciences.

Editors are expected to act professionally, impartially, and ethically, with a strong commitment to ensuring the quality and impact of the journal’s published research.

As a reviewer for Journal of Human-Social Nexus, you play an essential role in maintaining the journal’s academic standards and ensuring the quality of the research we publish. The peer review process is a critical part of the scholarly publishing workflow, and your feedback helps authors improve their work while guiding the editorial team in making informed decisions.

Below are detailed guidelines for reviewers, outlining your responsibilities, expectations, and best practices for reviewing manuscripts.

1. General Responsibilities

Impartiality and Objectivity:

• Reviewers must evaluate manuscripts based solely on their academic merit and relevance to the journal's scope. Personal opinions, biases, or relationships with the authors should not influence the review.

• Fairness: Ensure that you treat all authors and manuscripts equally, regardless of their institutional affiliation, nationality, or other personal characteristics.
  
  

Confidentiality:

• All manuscripts under review are confidential documents. You must not disclose or discuss the contents of the manuscript with anyone outside of the editorial process.

• Any information gained during the review process must not be used for personal gain or advantage.
  
  

Constructive Feedback:

• Reviewers are expected to provide constructive feedback to help authors improve their work. Comments should be specific, respectful, and focused on improving the manuscript's clarity, methodology, and overall quality.

• If you identify weaknesses or flaws in the manuscript, please suggest ways to improve it. Criticisms should be framed positively, offering actionable suggestions where possible.
  
  

Timeliness:

• You are expected to complete your review within 4-6 weeks from receiving the manuscript. If you need additional time, inform the editorial team as soon as possible.

• If you are unable to review the manuscript within the specified timeframe or if you feel unqualified to review it, please decline the invitation promptly.
  
  

2. Types of Reviewers

Expert Reviewers:

• Reviewers should be experts in the field relevant to the manuscript’s subject matter. Your expertise is critical in providing an informed assessment of the work’s contribution to the discipline.
  
  

Ethical Reviewers:

• As part of your responsibility, you must ensure that the research presented adheres to ethical standards. This includes checking whether the study involved appropriate ethical approval and whether conflicts of interest have been declared by the authors.
  
  

3. Review Process

Initial Assessment:

• Relevance to the Journal: Review the manuscript to ensure it fits within the journal’s scope, which includes topics in the humanities, social sciences, and interdisciplinary research.

• Novelty and Originality: Consider whether the manuscript presents original research, new ideas, or advancements in the field. If the manuscript simply repeats existing ideas without adding new insights, it may not be suitable for publication.
  
  

Content Evaluation:

• Clarity and Organization: Evaluate whether the manuscript is clearly written and logically organized. Are the research objectives, methodology, and conclusions well-defined? Does the article follow a logical flow from introduction to conclusion

• Methodology: Assess whether the research methodology is appropriate, sound, and clearly explained. Are there any flaws in the approach that could affect the validity of the results?

• Data and Results: Check whether the data analysis is thorough and if the conclusions drawn are supported by the data. Look for any inconsistencies or gaps in the analysis.

• Literature Review: Ensure that the manuscript provides a comprehensive and up-to-date literature review, and that it engages with the relevant research in the field. The literature should not only summarize existing work but also identify gaps the manuscript addresses.

• Contributions to the Field: Evaluate the manuscript’s potential to contribute new insights or knowledge to the field. Does the manuscript fill a gap in existing research? Does it offer practical implications or theoretical advancements?
  
  

Ethical Considerations:

• Ensure that the authors have adhered to ethical guidelines in their research, including obtaining proper ethics approval for studies involving human subjects or animals.

• Verify that the manuscript discloses any conflicts of interest and that the authors have provided appropriate acknowledgments for funding or support.
  
  

4. Review Report

Confidential Comments to the Editor:

• In addition to comments for the authors, you may provide confidential feedback to the editor about your evaluation of the manuscript’s quality, ethical considerations, and potential for publication.

• You may express any concerns that are not appropriate to share with the authors, such as ethical issues, plagiarism, or conflicts of interest.
  
  

Comments for Authors:

• The review should include clear, constructive feedback aimed at helping the authors improve their manuscript.

• Provide specific suggestions for improvements. These may include:

  • Revisions to the clarity of arguments or structure.

  • Suggestions for additional references or relevant literature to strengthen the argument.

  • Recommendations for improving the methodology or addressing gaps in the data analysis.

  • Comments on improving the overall presentation of the paper, including grammar and style.
    
    

Recommendation:
At the end of your review, you will be asked to recommend one of the following actions:

• Accept: The manuscript is suitable for publication without major revisions.

• Minor Revisions: The manuscript is suitable for publication but requires minor changes.

• Major Revisions: The manuscript requires significant changes before it can be considered for publication.

• Reject: The manuscript is not suitable for publication in its current form.
  
  

5. Conflicts of Interest

Disclosure of Conflicts:

• You must disclose any potential conflicts of interest before accepting the review assignment. Conflicts of interest can include professional, personal, or financial relationships that may affect your ability to review the manuscript impartially.

• If you are unsure whether a potential conflict of interest exists, it is better to err on the side of caution and disclose it to the editorial team.
  
  

Recusal:

• If you have a direct connection with the authors (e.g., co-authorship, personal relationships, recent collaborations), you should recuse yourself from reviewing the manuscript.

• If you are aware of any reason why you cannot provide an unbiased review (e.g., competing research interests), it is best to decline the invitation to review.
  
  

6. Ethical Guidelines for Reviewers

Plagiarism and Data Integrity:

• As a reviewer, you are responsible for identifying any potential instances of plagiarism, self-plagiarism, or data manipulation. If you suspect any form of academic misconduct, report it to the editorial team immediately.

• Ensure that the authors have properly cited all the data, sources, and references used in their manuscript.
  
  

Confidentiality:

• You must maintain strict confidentiality regarding the manuscript and review process. Do not share the manuscript with others or use the content for personal or professional gain.

Constructive Feedback:

• Always provide constructive and respectful feedback. Reviews should focus on the content and substance of the manuscript rather than the personal characteristics of the authors.

• Avoid any personal attacks or offensive language in your review.
  
  

7. Timeliness and Responsiveness

Timely Reviews:

• Complete your review within 4-6 weeks of receiving the manuscript. If you are unable to meet this deadline, notify the editorial team immediately so that alternative arrangements can be made.

• Timely feedback is essential to maintain the journal’s publishing schedule and uphold a fair review process for all authors.
  
  

Communication:

• If you are unable to review a manuscript or feel that you are not qualified to assess it, please decline the review invitation promptly so the editorial team can find an alternative reviewer.

• If you encounter any issues during the review process, such as difficulty accessing the manuscript or any ethical concerns, please communicate these to the editorial team.
  
  

As a reviewer for Journal of Human-Social Nexus, you are playing a critical role in shaping the academic rigor of the journal. Your feedback helps improve the quality of published research and ensures that only the highest quality manuscripts are accepted for publication. By following these guidelines, you contribute to maintaining the integrity and reputation of the journal and support the "Academics for a Better Society" mission.

Thank you for your invaluable contribution to the peer review process!

Journal of Human-Social Nexus follows a continuous publishing model to ensure that high-quality research is disseminated efficiently and promptly. Our publishing policy is designed to accommodate the fast-paced nature of academic research while maintaining rigorous editorial standards. Below is an overview of our publishing model, frequency of issues, and submission process.

1. Continuous Publishing Model

Continuous Publishing refers to the practice of publishing articles as soon as they are ready, rather than waiting for an entire issue to be completed. This ensures that research is disseminated quickly, maximizing the visibility and impact of individual articles.

In this model:

• Accepted manuscripts are published online as soon as they are finalized and ready for publication, making them immediately available to the global academic community.

• The journal will not hold manuscripts for a specific issue but will instead publish articles as soon as possible after they have been peer-reviewed, revised, and finalized.
  
  

2. Issue Frequency

ABS Humanities and Social Sciences Letters will release four issues per year, with regular quarterly issues in the following months:

• March

• June

• September

• December
  
  

Each issue will be released at the end of the corresponding quarter, ensuring that the latest research is made available throughout the year. These issues will include articles that were published continuously throughout the quarter.

3. Article and Issue Publication

Article-based publication:

• As soon as an article is accepted and goes through the editorial, peer review, and revision processes, it is published online and assigned a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) for easy citation and tracking.

Compilation into Quarterly Issues:

• While the journal follows continuous publication, the articles published within each calendar quarter will be compiled and organized into a quarterly issue. These issues are presented with a clear table of contents and made accessible for download from the journal’s platform.
  
  

4. Online First and Final Issue Formatting

• Online First: Articles will appear as “Online First” upon acceptance. These will be available for citation and referencing prior to being included in the quarterly issue.

• Final Formatting: Once the quarterly issue is compiled, the articles will be formatted for issue publication and made available in PDF format for easy access by readers.
  
  

5. Article Processing and Publication Timeline

• Timeliness: The journal aims to ensure that articles move through the editorial and review process efficiently. The typical time from submission to publication is approximately 8-10 weeks, depending on the manuscript's revision cycle.

• Peer Review: All manuscripts are subject to a double-blind peer review process. After peer review and any necessary revisions, the article will be formatted for publication.

• Final Decision: The final decision on publication will be communicated to the corresponding author as soon as possible. Accepted articles will be published in the next available issue, following the journal’s continuous publishing schedule.
  
  

6. Accessibility and Open Access

• Open Access: All articles are published in open access format, meaning they are freely available to all readers worldwide. No subscription or payment is required for access.

• DOI Assignment: Every article published in Journal of Human-Social Nexus will be assigned a DOI to ensure its easy discoverability, citation, and long-term preservation.
  
  

7. Submission and Updates to Authors

• Ongoing Submissions: Authors are encouraged to submit their manuscripts at any time, and they will be processed according to the journal’s peer review and editorial procedures.

• Updates to Authors: Corresponding authors will be kept informed about the status of their manuscript throughout the review and publication process. Once an article is accepted, authors will be notified about its expected Online First publication date.
  
  

8. Future Growth and Expansion

As ABS Humanities and Social Sciences Letters grows, we plan to continue enhancing our publication model to accommodate the increasing volume of submissions and expand our reach in the academic community. Our goal is to make Journal of Human-Social Nexus one of the leading journals in the field, with a focus on interdisciplinary research and high-impact contributions to the humanities and social sciences.

By adopting a continuous publishing model and releasing four issues per year, Journal of Human-Social Nexus ensures that the latest, high-quality research is made available to the global academic community in a timely and efficient manner. Our commitment to open access and fast publication allows authors to have their work widely disseminated and easily accessible, maximizing its impact.

Journal of Human-Social Nexus is a fully open access journal, which means that all articles published are freely available to readers worldwide. To support the costs of maintaining this open access model, we apply an Article Processing Charge (APC) to cover the expenses associated with the editorial process, peer review, copyediting, typesetting, and long-term preservation of articles.

Below is a detailed overview of our APC policy:

1. APC Amount

The Article Processing Charge (APC) for each accepted manuscript is $1200.

This fee covers:

• Peer review: The cost of managing the peer review process, including reviewer remuneration and administrative support.

• Editorial services: Manuscript handling, content editing, formatting, and quality assurance to ensure that the manuscript meets the journal’s academic standards.

• Open access publication: Ensuring that the article is made freely available to readers worldwide, without subscription barriers, and is indexed in various academic databases.

• Long-term archiving: The journal ensures that published articles are preserved and remain accessible in the long term.
  
  

2. APC Waiver Policy

We are pleased to offer an APC waiver for all accepted manuscripts submitted before December 2028. This means that during this period, authors whose articles are accepted for publication will not be required to pay the APC fee.

• APC Waiver: Fully waived for accepted articles from submission to December 2028.

• Post-2028: After December 2028, the standard APC of $1200 will apply to all accepted articles.
  
  

3. Benefits of Open Access

By charging an APC, we are able to provide the following benefits:

• Global Reach: Articles are published under an open access model, allowing unrestricted access to readers worldwide. This increases the visibility and impact of research.

• Faster Publication: With continuous publication, articles are available to the public as soon as they are ready, ensuring timely dissemination of the latest research.

• Citations and Discoverability: Open access articles are more likely to be cited due to their free availability, which improves the academic impact of the published work.

• Wide Accessibility: Researchers, practitioners, and policymakers from around the world, especially those from underfunded institutions or countries, can access articles without paywalls or subscription fees.
  
  

4. How the APC is Used

The APC helps to cover the costs associated with the following services:

• Editorial and administrative support for handling submissions, peer review, and communication with authors.

• Peer review management, which involves selecting and inviting appropriate reviewers and ensuring the review process is fair and timely.

• Professional copyediting, formatting, and typesetting to ensure articles meet academic publishing standards.

• Long-term digital preservation of articles to ensure access for future generations of researchers.

• Indexing and visibility in major academic databases and search engines, ensuring that the published articles reach the right audience.
  
  

5. Funding and Sponsorship for APC

Authors who require financial assistance to cover the APC may inquire about potential sponsorship or funding opportunities. Some institutions, research grants, or funders may offer financial support for APCs. Authors are encouraged to check with their institutions, research sponsors, or funding agencies for potential reimbursement options.

6. How to Pay the APC

Once your article is accepted for publication, you will receive a payment invoice along with payment instructions. The payment can be made through the following methods:

• Credit card (Visa, MasterCard, etc.)

• Bank transfer

• Institutional invoicing (if applicable)

Payment must be received before the article is scheduled for publication.

7. APC Refund Policy

In the rare event that an article is retracted after publication due to ethical violations, data errors, or issues identified post-publication, the APC may be refunded on a case-by-case basis. Refund requests will be handled by the editorial team, and the author will need to provide relevant documentation and justification for the request.

8. Future Changes to APC

While the APC waiver will be available until December 2028, the journal may review and adjust the APC policy beyond that date based on changes in operational costs, technological advancements, or shifts in the publishing landscape. Any changes will be communicated to authors well in advance.

The Article Processing Charge (APC) ensures the sustainability of Journal of Human-Social Nexus while maintaining a high-quality open access model for the dissemination of academic research. This fee supports the peer review process, editorial services, and the open access publication model, enabling greater visibility and impact for published work.

We are committed to keeping the APC affordable and accessible, particularly through the APC waiver available until December 2028, and encourage authors to take full advantage of this opportunity.

For any further questions or concerns regarding the APC, please feel free to contact us at publisher@absresearchacademy.com

The Indexing & Abstracting page provides important information about the journal's current and future indexing goals. Journal of Human-Social Nexus is committed to ensuring that its articles are widely accessible to scholars, researchers, and institutions across the world. In line with this, we aim to have our journal indexed in top global databases and platforms, which will enhance the visibility and citation of our published articles.

Currently, our journal is indexed in several open-access repositories and platforms, including Google Scholar, CrossRef, and ROAD. However, we are in the process of applying for indexing in leading databases such as Scopus, Web of Science, DOAJ, and other prestigious indexing platforms that will increase the journal’s reach and academic impact.

Current Indexing Status:

• Google Scholar: All articles will be indexed in Google Scholar, ensuring that they are searchable and discoverable.

• CrossRef: Each article will be assigned a DOI (Digital Object Identifier) to ensure proper citation and trackability.

• ROAD (Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources): Our journal will be listed in ROAD, which allows for the discovery of open-access journals across different disciplines.
  
  

Future Indexing Goals:

• Scopus: We are actively working towards gaining Scopus indexing to enhance the journal’s credibility and academic visibility. Our aim is to be indexed by Scopus within the next year.

• Web of Science: We aim to apply for inclusion in the Web of Science Core Collection, a leading citation database.

• DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals): We are in the process of applying for inclusion in DOAJ to ensure that our journal is discoverable by a wider audience of open-access researchers.

• Other Platforms: We aim to expand our reach by applying to additional indexing services as the journal grows, including those focused on humanities and social sciences research.
  
  

Aim to Enhance Visibility and Impact:

Our goal is to ensure that Journal of Human-Social Nexus is accessible to the global academic community and that our articles are easily discoverable, cited, and contribute to advancing knowledge in the humanities and social sciences. By being indexed in prominent databases, the journal will:

• Increase the visibility of published research.

• Enhance the impact and citations of the work published in the journal.

• Ensure global accessibility and compliance with open-access mandates.
  
  

Updates to Be Made Soon:

• The Indexing & Abstracting page will be updated soon to include a list of databases we are currently working on and those in the pipeline for future indexing. As we achieve indexing in Scopus, Web of Science, and other databases, we will update this page accordingly to reflect the most current information.
  
  

We are committed to ensuring that our journal’s articles are widely accessible, and we continue to work diligently to achieve global recognition and indexation in top databases.

At Journal of Human-Social Nexus, we are committed to ensuring the long-term preservation and accessibility of the research we publish. Our Archiving Policy is designed to provide confidence to authors, researchers, and readers that all published articles are securely stored, preserved, and remain available for future generations. This policy outlines our strategies for digital preservation and long-term access to content, ensuring that articles are not lost over time and are retrievable through various digital platforms.

Currently, our archiving policy ensures that all published content is stored in compliance with the highest standards of academic publishing. We take steps to ensure that the intellectual output published in our journal remains permanently accessible to the global academic community.

Current Archiving Practices:

• LOCKSS (Lots of Copies Keep Stuff Safe): Our journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to ensure the long-term preservation of all published articles. This system stores copies of the journal in multiple locations worldwide, allowing for content retrieval if any platform or publisher’s server fails.

• CLOCKSS (Controlled LOCKSS): We are also working towards integration with CLOCKSS, a digital preservation system that guarantees that the journal’s content remains accessible even if the publisher or platform ceases to exist.

• Institutional Repositories: We encourage authors to deposit their published articles in their respective institutional repositories for long-term archiving and to enhance the visibility of their research.
  
  

Future Archiving Goals:

• Collaboration with More Repositories: We aim to expand our archiving practices by collaborating with more digital repositories and open access platforms to ensure that articles are archived and preserved across multiple systems.

• DOAJ Archiving: As part of our ongoing commitment to open access, we plan to ensure that all articles published in Journal of Human-Social Nexus are also archived in the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), which provides a comprehensive record of open-access publications.

• Additional Backup Systems: We are working on implementing additional systems for secure backup storage to guarantee the availability and integrity of all journal content.
  
  

Archiving and Access Assurance:

We are dedicated to maintaining the accessibility of our articles through both traditional and innovative means of digital preservation. Our Archiving Policy aims to:

• Ensure permanent access to all published content.

• Provide disaster recovery solutions for journal data and articles.

• Maintain full digital access to every issue and article published by the journal.

• Ensure that all articles are easily retrievable by researchers and readers long after publication.
  
  

Updates to Be Made Soon:

The Archiving Policy will be updated soon to reflect future collaborations, the systems we are currently implementing, and the more advanced technologies we plan to use for content preservation. These updates will be made public on the website as soon as they are fully integrated into our workflow, ensuring transparency and providing the journal's community with accurate and up-to-date information about how published content will be preserved.

We are continuously working to enhance the long-term accessibility and preservation of the journal's content, and we are dedicated to expanding our archiving practices to comply with the best standards in academic publishing.

Journal of Human-Social Nexus is dedicated to maintaining the highest standards of publication ethics and integrity in scholarly publishing. Our policies are guided by the principles outlined by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), to which we fully adhere. These ethical guidelines apply to authors, reviewers, editors, and the publisher, ensuring fairness, transparency, and accountability at every stage of the publishing process. 

1. Responsibilities of Authors

Authors submitting to Journal of Human-Social Nexus must ensure that:

• Originality: The manuscript is original, not plagiarized, and has not been published or submitted elsewhere.

• Acknowledgment of Sources: All sources of data, figures, literature, or previously published ideas are properly cited.

• Authorship: Only those who have made substantial contributions to the manuscript are listed as authors, and all authors have approved the final version before submission.

• Conflict of Interest: Authors must disclose any financial or personal conflicts of interest that may have influenced the research.

• Ethical Compliance: Research involving human or animal subjects must comply with ethical standards and include approval from an appropriate ethics committee.
  
  

2. Responsibilities of Editors

Editors are responsible for:

• Fair and Unbiased Decision-Making: Manuscripts are evaluated solely based on academic merit, without regard to race, gender, religion, nationality, or institutional affiliation of the authors.

• Confidentiality: Editors must protect the confidentiality of all submitted manuscripts and not disclose information to anyone other than those involved in the editorial process.

• Ethical Oversight: Editors must ensure that all research complies with ethical standards and take prompt action in cases of ethical concerns or misconduct.

• Handling Misconduct: If ethical breaches are detected (e.g., plagiarism, duplicate publication, data falsification), editors will act according to COPE flowcharts and may initiate retractions or corrections as needed.
  
  

3. Responsibilities of Reviewers

Reviewers are expected to:

• Maintain Confidentiality: Manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents.

• Provide Constructive Feedback: Reviews should be objective, respectful, and intended to help the author improve the manuscript.

• Avoid Conflicts of Interest: Reviewers must disclose any potential conflicts of interest and decline to review manuscripts where such conflicts exist.

• Timely Review: Reviews should be completed within the agreed timeframe to maintain the efficiency of the peer review process.
  
  

4. Plagiarism and Redundant Publication

Journal of Human-Social Nexus has a zero-tolerance policy on plagiarism.

• All manuscripts are checked using plagiarism detection software.

• Submissions must have less than 15% similarity to previously published work, excluding references and properly quoted content.

• Redundant or duplicate publication is strictly prohibited and will lead to immediate rejection or retraction.
  
  

5. Data Fabrication and Falsification

Authors must not:

• Fabricate or manipulate data, images, or results.

• Falsify citations or invent results that cannot be substantiated.

If evidence of such misconduct is found, the article will be retracted, and further submissions by the authors may be banned.

6. Retractions, Corrections, and Editorial Expressions of Concern

We follow COPE guidelines in handling post-publication issues:

• Retractions will be issued when there is evidence of misconduct, ethical breaches, or unreliable findings.

• Corrections (Errata or Corrigenda) will be issued in cases of honest errors or necessary clarifications.

• Editorial Expressions of Concern may be published when an article is under investigation.
  
  

7. Conflict of Interest Disclosure

All participants in the publication process (authors, reviewers, editors) must declare any financial, personal, or professional relationships that could influence their work.
This includes funding, employment, consultancies, honoraria, or any other competing interest.

8. Ethical Oversight for Human and Animal Subjects

• Research involving human participants must include informed consent and approval from an institutional ethics committee.

• Research involving animals must follow internationally accepted guidelines for ethical treatment and use.

Ethics approval reference numbers and compliance statements must be included in the manuscript.

9. Use of Generative AI Tools

• Authors must declare any use of generative AI tools (e.g., ChatGPT) in manuscript preparation.

• AI must not be listed as an author.

• Final responsibility for the accuracy and originality of the manuscript lies with the human authors.
  
  

10. Compliance with COPE

Journal of Human-Social Nexus follows the recommendations and procedures outlined by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and is committed to maintaining ethical publishing at every stage.
For more details, please visit COPE: https://publicationethics.org/

Our ethical standards reflect our mission: Academics for a Better Society. Upholding publication integrity is essential to building trust with authors, readers, and the global scholarly community. We encourage all contributors to familiarize themselves with these ethics policies and to act responsibly throughout the research and publication process.

Special Issue Guidelines and Guest Editor Roles

Journal of Human-Social Nexus warmly welcomes proposals for Special Issues that highlight cutting-edge research, timely topics, and emerging fields of study within the humanities and social sciences. Special issues provide an opportunity to showcase a collection of high-quality articles on a particular theme, allowing scholars to contribute to a focused, thought-provoking discussion that advances knowledge and encourages academic dialogue.

1. Special Issue Proposals

We invite Guest Editors to submit proposals for special issues that align with the journal’s mission of promoting research for a better society. If you have a topic in mind that is both original and academically significant, we encourage you to propose a special issue that can make an impactful contribution to the field.

To submit a proposal, please include:

• Title of the Special Issue

• Theme and Objectives (250-500 words) explaining the relevance and importance of the issue

• Names and Affiliations of proposed Guest Editors

• Tentative List of Contributors (if available)

• Proposed Timeline for submission and publication

• Call for Papers (CFP) (optional, but helpful)
  
  

2. Proposal Evaluation and Approval

Our editorial board evaluates proposals based on their relevance to the journal’s scope, academic merit, and potential contribution to the broader scholarly community. Once your proposal is approved, you’ll receive an official invitation to begin your role as a Guest Editor.

3. Publication Process

• Continuous Publication: Articles are published online as soon as they are accepted, contributing to a fast and efficient publishing process. Special issues will be compiled into an issue later in the year, but articles will be made available immediately.

• Open Access: All articles in Journal of Human-Social Nexus are published in open access format, ensuring global accessibility and visibility.

• Peer Review: Every submission will undergo a double-blind peer review process to maintain the highest standards of scholarly integrity.
  
  

4. APC Waiver

To support the academic community, we are offering a full APC waiver until December 2028 for all accepted articles within special issues. This ensures that authors can publish their research without any financial burden.

Guest Editor Roles and Responsibilities

ABS Humanities and Social Sciences Letters is committed to working closely with our Guest Editors to produce high-impact special issues. As a Guest Editor, you will play a central role in shaping the content and direction of the issue. Here’s a breakdown of your responsibilities:

1. Academic Leadership

• Define the Special Issue’s Theme: Develop a clear, compelling theme for the special issue that aligns with the journal’s focus and brings attention to emerging or critical topics.

• Guest Editor Editorial: Optionally, write an introduction to the special issue, summarizing the key contributions and significance of the articles.

2. Managing Submissions

• Inviting Contributors: Actively invite high-quality submissions, ensuring that the topics align with the theme of the special issue.

• Review Process: Oversee the review process in collaboration with the journal's editorial office, ensuring that peer reviews are timely and constructive.

• Decision-Making: Work with the Editor-in-Chief to make decisions on manuscript acceptance, revision, or rejection based on the reviews received.

3. Ethical Oversight

• Ensure fair and unbiased evaluation of all submissions.

• Disclose any conflicts of interest and recuse yourself from reviewing any papers where a conflict exists.

4. Promotion and Outreach

• Help promote the Special Issue through academic networks, mailing lists, and social media channels to attract high-quality submissions and readership.

5. Timely Publication

• Collaborate with the editorial team to ensure that submissions and revisions are handled according to the established timeline, aiming for publication within the planned timeframe.
  
  

6. Recognition

Guest Editors will receive full acknowledgment in the Special Issue for their contribution to its academic direction and quality. Additionally, you will be invited to future editorial collaborations and given a certificate of editorial contribution.

Submit Your Special Issue Proposal Today!

If you are passionate about a topic that aligns with our journal's mission and have the expertise to lead a special issue, we’d love to hear from you. Please submit your special issue proposal or contact us for more details.

📧 Email: publisher@absresearchacademy.com
🌐 Website: Updated soon

Journal of Human-Social Nexus is excited to collaborate with you in advancing knowledge and driving positive societal change through thoughtful, interdisciplinary research.

Journal of Human-Social Nexus invites scholars, researchers, and academics to submit their original, high-quality research articles for consideration in upcoming issues. We aim to publish interdisciplinary research that addresses contemporary issues, promotes intellectual discussions, and contributes to social, cultural, and academic development.

Journal Scope and Areas of Interest

We welcome contributions from across the humanities and social sciences, including, but not limited to, the following areas:

1. Social Sciences & Policy

2. Humanities & Cultural Studies

3. Business, Economics & Management

4. Health & Medical Humanities

5. Environmental & Sustainability Studies

6. Education & Information Sciences

7. Media & Communication Studies

8. Law & Ethics

9. Hospitality, Tourism & Leisure

10. Technology, Innovation & Society

We particularly encourage submissions that address interdisciplinary research, social issues, global challenges, and sustainability, contributing to a better understanding of human behavior, society, and the world at large.

Submission Guidelines

Manuscript Types
We accept the following types of manuscripts:

• Research Articles: Original research that makes a significant contribution to the field.

• Review Articles: Comprehensive reviews on emerging topics, theories, or methodologies.

• Letters to the Editor: Short pieces providing commentary on recently published articles or contemporary issues in the field.

• Special Issue Submissions: Papers related to the themes of the current or upcoming special issues (please check our Special Issue Guidelines).
  
  

Manuscript Length

• Research Articles: Maximum of 4000 words.

• Review Articles: Maximum of 6000 words.

• Letters to the Editor: Maximum of 1000 words.
  
  

Formatting Guidelines

• Manuscripts should be submitted in Word or PDF format.

• Use APA 7th Edition referencing style for citations and references.

• Include a brief abstract (250 words max), keywords (4-6), and author affiliations.

• Tables and figures should be embedded in the manuscript at the appropriate points, numbered consecutively.
  
  

Submission Process

• All submissions must be made through our online submission system or via email to our editorial team (contact details provided on the website).

• Please ensure that your manuscript includes all required components, including the cover letter, abstract, keywords, and author details.

• A plagiarism check will be performed on each submission using reliable detection tools. Manuscripts must have a plagiarism similarity of below 15%.
  
  

Peer Review Process

• All submitted manuscripts will undergo double-blind peer review. Reviewers will assess the manuscript’s originality, methodology, relevance, and clarity.

• The editorial team will make a final decision based on reviewer comments and the manuscript's contribution to the field.

• Authors may be asked to revise their manuscripts based on reviewer feedback before final acceptance.
  
  

Important Dates

• Deadline for Submissions: Updated soon

• Notification of Initial Review Decision: Updated soon

• Final Submission Deadline: Updated soon

• Publication Date: Updated soon
  
  

Benefits of Publishing with Journal of Human-Social Nexus

• Open Access: All articles are published in open access, ensuring maximum visibility and accessibility to a global audience.

• No Submission Fees: We do not charge any submission fees, and the APC (Article Processing Charge) of $1200 is waived until December 2028 for all accepted articles.

• Global Exposure: Articles are indexed in Google Scholar, CrossRef, and other databases, enhancing their visibility and citation potential.

• Academic Recognition: Publishing in Journal of Human-Social Nexus gives your research an international platform to reach a wide academic audience.
  
  

Special Issues

We are also inviting submissions for upcoming Special Issues on topics such as:

• Updated soon

• Updated soon

Please check our Special Issue Guidelines for further details on submission and guest editor roles.

Why Publish with Us?

• Rigorous Peer Review: Our journal follows a double-blind peer review system, ensuring that your manuscript is evaluated fairly and transparently.

• Interdisciplinary Focus: We encourage submissions from a range of disciplines within the humanities and social sciences, fostering a rich and diverse body of work.

• Impactful Research: By publishing with us, your work will contribute to positive social change and promote sustainable development, aligning with our journal’s mission to advance knowledge for a better society.
  
  

Contact Us

For any inquiries or further information, please contact our editorial office at:

• 📧 Email: publisher@absresearchacademy.com 

• 🌐 Website: Updated soon

• 📞 Phone: Updated soon
  
  

We look forward to receiving your submissions and contributing to the advancement of research in the humanities and social sciences.

Journal Statistics - Journal of Human-Social Nexus

We are excited to share some key statistics about ABS Humanities and Social Sciences Letters as we continue to grow and contribute to the global academic community. These statistics reflect the journal’s impact, reach, and commitment to advancing knowledge in the humanities and social sciences.

While we are still in the early stages of collecting comprehensive data, we aim to provide up-to-date and meaningful metrics that will showcase the growing influence of our journal.

Note: These statistics will be updated soon and will include more detailed insights into our readership, submissions, and academic impact.

Key Journal Metrics

• Published Articles: Updated soon.

• Citations: Updated soon.

• Impact Factor: Updated soon.

• Altmetrics: Updated soon.

• Geographic Reach: Updated soon.
  
  

Journal Growth

• Quarterly Issues: Updated soon.

• Submission Growth: Updated soon.

• Reviewer Network: Updated soon.
  
  

Upcoming Updates

We are committed to transparency and will be updating these statistics regularly to keep our community informed about the impact and progress of Journal of Human-Social Nexus. Future updates will include:

• Detailed Citation Analytics

• Impact Factor (once indexed in Scopus and Web of Science)

• Submission Trends: Insights on the types of research being submitted

• Readership Demographics: Including geographical data and academic sectors

• Top-Cited Articles: Highlighting the most impactful research published
  
  

Stay tuned for updates! As we continue to expand our global reach, we aim to provide authors, readers, and scholars with valuable data on the journal’s performance, impact, and contribution to the humanities and social sciences fields.

We thank our community for their continued support, and we look forward to sharing more statistics as our journal grows!

At ABS Research Academy, we understand the importance of clear and precise language in academic publishing. To support authors in presenting their research in the best possible way, we are pleased to offer professional English editing services for all manuscripts submitted to ABS Humanities and Social Sciences Letters.

Our English editing services are designed to help authors refine their manuscripts, ensuring that they meet the highest standards of language quality and academic writing. Whether you are a non-native English speaker or just looking to improve the clarity and flow of your manuscript, our experienced editors are here to assist. 

What Our Editing Services Include:

• Grammar and Syntax: Correcting errors in grammar, punctuation, and sentence structure.

• Clarity and Flow: Improving the overall readability of the manuscript, ensuring smooth transitions and logical coherence.

• Academic Tone and Style: Ensuring that the manuscript adheres to the formal and professional tone expected in academic writing.

• Word Choice: Enhancing vocabulary to improve precision and reduce redundancy.

• Consistency: Checking consistency in formatting, citations, and references according to APA 7th edition or any other specified style.

• Overall Proofreading: A thorough final check for spelling errors, typos, and formatting issues.

Exclusive Offer – 60% Discount!

We are delighted to offer a 60% discount on all English editing services for manuscripts submitted to Journal of Human-Social Nexus. This offer is available for all manuscripts submitted until December 2028. Our goal is to help authors publish their work without worrying about the cost of language refinement.

Why Choose ABS Research Academy's Editing Services?

• Experienced Editors: Our team consists of highly qualified editors with expertise in the humanities and social sciences, ensuring that your manuscript is polished and ready for publication.

• Fast Turnaround: We understand that time is critical in the academic world. Our editors provide quick and efficient service without compromising on quality.

• Affordable Pricing: With a 60% discount, you can access high-quality editing services at a fraction of the cost, making academic publishing more accessible for authors worldwide.

• Guaranteed Quality: We are committed to providing top-tier editing services that will help your manuscript meet the standards required by Journal of Human-Social Nexus.
  
  

How to Access Our English Editing Services:

1. Submit Your Manuscript: When you submit your manuscript to Journal of Human-Social Nexus, you can opt to use our English editing services.

2. Select the Editing Service: Choose the type of editing service you need (e.g., full manuscript editing, targeted revisions, or proofreading).

3. Receive Your Edited Manuscript: After editing, we will send you the revised manuscript with tracked changes and suggestions for improvement.

4. Final Approval: Review the changes and approve the final version of your manuscript before submission.
   
   

Get Started Today!

Take advantage of this limited-time offer and ensure your research is presented at its best with professional English editing services from ABS Research Academy. Submit your manuscript and use the discount code 60EDIT2028 to claim your 60% discount.

For more information on how to access our editing services, please contact us at:

• 📧 Email

• 🌐 Website: Link

ABS Research Academy is dedicated to supporting researchers and authors in achieving success in their academic publishing journey. We look forward to helping you polish your manuscript for publication in ABS Humanities and Social Sciences Letters!

Guidelines for Conference Organizers - Journal of Human-Social Nexus:

Journal of Human-Social Nexus is committed to fostering collaboration and knowledge exchange within the global academic community. We encourage conference organizers to work with us to promote scholarly events that align with our mission of advancing research and addressing societal challenges through interdisciplinary exploration in the humanities and social sciences.

1. Purpose of Collaboration

Conference organizers play a key role in facilitating academic discussions and advancing research in various fields. We invite organizers of academic conferences to collaborate with ABS Humanities and Social Sciences Letters to ensure their events have maximum visibility and academic impact.

Through our collaboration, we aim to:

• Provide academic credibility and visibility to conferences by promoting them in our journal and website.

• Encourage conference proceedings to be published in special issues of the journal or as standalone articles, offering wider dissemination.

• Support conference organizers in raising awareness and attracting diverse participants and contributors.

2. Responsibilities of Conference Organizers

Conference Planning and Execution

• Organize the logistics of the conference, including setting a theme, selecting keynote speakers, managing submissions, and providing a platform for presenting research.

• Ensure that the conference is accessible to a wide range of participants, including those from underrepresented regions and diverse backgrounds.

• Develop an academic program that encourages interdisciplinary discussion and addresses contemporary societal issues.
  
  

Collaboration with the Journal

• Submit conference proceedings for potential publication in Journal of Human-Social Nexus, either as a special issue or as individual articles, following the journal’s submission and review processes.

• Promote Journal of Human-Social Nexus as a partner journal in conference materials and communications.

• Ensure that participants are encouraged to submit high-quality research and original articles from the conference for potential publication.
  
  

Engage with the Academic Community

• Encourage active participation from diverse scholars, researchers, and students in the conference, ensuring broad representation across disciplines and regions.

• Foster an environment that promotes open discussion, idea exchange, and collaboration within the humanities and social sciences fields.
  
  

3. Benefits of Collaboration with Journal of Human-Social Nexus

• Publication Opportunities: Conference proceedings can be published as part of a special issue in the journal, or selected articles can be published as standalone papers, ensuring that the research shared at the conference reaches a global audience.

• Enhanced Visibility: Your conference will be featured on our website, in newsletters, and on social media, ensuring broader academic and professional recognition.

• Open Access: All published content will be freely accessible to a global audience, providing researchers with the opportunity to gain maximum exposure and academic recognition.

• Academic Credibility: Collaborating with a respected, peer-reviewed journal such as Journal of Human-Social Nexus enhances the credibility of the conference and its proceedings.
  
  

4. Special Issue Proposal for Conferences

Conference organizers may propose a special issue related to their event, which can include selected papers from the conference or a collection of related research that emerged from the discussions. The special issue will be managed and peer-reviewed by the editorial team of Journal of Human-Social Nexus

To propose a special issue, conference organizers should submit the following:

• Special Issue Title and Scope: A description of the theme and focus areas of the issue.

• Guest Editors: Details of the guest editors, including their academic credentials and experience.

• Timeline: Suggested submission dates and editorial deadlines.

• Call for Papers (CFP): A draft CFP that can be shared with conference participants and potential contributors.
  
  

5. Conference Partnering with ABS Research Academy

ABS Research Academy offers additional support to conference organizers by:

• Providing training and workshops for conference participants on academic writing, publishing, and research methods.

• Offering scholarships or discounted services for delegates or researchers needing financial assistance for conference participation or publication fees.
  
  

6. How to Get in Touch

If you are organizing a conference and wish to partner with Journal of Human-Social Nexus, please contact us at:

• 📧 Email: publisher@absresearchacademy.com 

• 🌐 Website: Updated soon. 

• 📞 Phone:
  
  

We look forward to partnering with you to facilitate high-impact academic events that drive forward scholarship and foster global collaboration.

At Journal of Human-Social Nexus, we are committed to fostering an inclusive, diverse, and equitable environment for researchers, authors, reviewers, and readers. We recognize that diversity is essential to advancing scholarly knowledge and ensuring that research reflects the complexity of global societies and human experiences.

We embrace diversity in all its forms, including but not limited to:

• Cultural and Geographic Diversity: We actively encourage submissions from researchers around the world, representing a wide range of countries, regions, and cultural backgrounds. Our journal is committed to amplifying voices from underrepresented and global communities.

• Interdisciplinary Perspectives: We value contributions that bring together different academic disciplines within the humanities and social sciences. By integrating diverse academic viewpoints, we believe that research can address complex, multifaceted issues and foster meaningful dialogue across fields.

• Gender, Race, and Ethnicity: We strive to ensure that all voices—regardless of gender, race, ethnicity, or other personal characteristics—are heard, respected, and represented in our journal. We actively encourage research that explores diversity-related topics, including issues of social justice, equality, and human rights.

• Disability and Accessibility: We support research that promotes the inclusion and representation of individuals with disabilities and aim to provide accessible formats for all readers, ensuring that our journal is open to everyone.

Our Commitment

We are committed to:

• Inclusive Publishing: Ensuring that research from scholars of all backgrounds and identities is fairly evaluated and published, while promoting equal opportunities for authors from diverse communities.

• Encouraging Diverse Scholarship: Supporting research that explores diverse topics, ideas, and methodologies, with a focus on improving societal understanding and promoting social change.

• Equal Opportunities: Providing an equitable platform for all contributors, regardless of their geographic location, institutional affiliation, or socioeconomic background.

• Respect and Recognition: Upholding a respectful and inclusive peer review process, where all reviewers and editors are expected to evaluate submissions fairly and without bias.

We recognize that true diversity is an ongoing process, and we are committed to continuously reviewing and improving our practices to ensure that we uphold these principles in every aspect of our editorial and publishing processes.

At Journal of Human-Social Nexus, we believe that fostering an inclusive environment enriches scholarly discourse and contributes to a more just and informed global society. By embracing diversity, we aim to amplify voices, promote cross-cultural understanding, and create a platform where all researchers can thrive.

ABS Publisher Outstanding Award for Young Scholars

ABS Publisher is proud to introduce the Outstanding Award for Young Scholars, which recognizes the exceptional contributions of early-career researchers in the fields of humanities and social sciences. This award aims to celebrate the achievements of young scholars whose research has demonstrated outstanding originality, academic rigor, and the potential to make a significant impact in their respective fields.

Award Overview

The ABS Publisher Outstanding Award will be awarded to three young scholars annually, offering them recognition for their hard work, dedication, and innovative research. This award seeks to encourage the next generation of academics by providing them with the platform, visibility, and resources to continue their scholarly journey.

Eligibility Criteria

To be eligible for the ABS Publisher Outstanding Award for Young Scholars, applicants must meet the following criteria:

• Age: Applicants must be under the age of 35 at the time of the application deadline.

• Academic Stage: The applicant should be in the early stages of their academic career (e.g., PhD students, postdoctoral researchers, or early-stage faculty members).

• Research Focus: Research must fall within the scope of humanities and social sciences. We encourage submissions from a wide range of disciplines, including but not limited to:

1. Social Sciences & Policy

2. Humanities & Cultural Studies

3. Business, Economics & Management

4. Health & Medical Humanities

5. Environmental & Sustainability Studies

6. Education & Information Sciences

7. Media & Communication Studies

8. Law & Ethics

9. Hospitality, Tourism & Leisure

10. Technology, Innovation & Society

• Innovation and Contribution: The research should demonstrate originality, addressing pressing global issues or offering innovative solutions to contemporary challenges.
  
  

Award Benefits

Each of the three selected young scholars will receive:

• Certificate of Achievement: An official certificate acknowledging the recipient's outstanding academic contribution.

• Publication Support: The opportunity to publish a feature article or research paper in Journal of Human-Social Nexus or a special issue associated with the award.

• Cash Prize: A cash prize of $300 to support the scholar’s future research endeavors or professional development.

• Mentorship: Access to a network of senior scholars and research leaders who can provide mentorship, guidance, and collaboration opportunities.

• Recognition: The awardees will be highlighted on the ABS Publisher website, in our annual report, and across our academic networks, providing them with increased visibility and recognition in the academic community.
  
  

Application Process

Young scholars interested in applying for the ABS Publisher Outstanding Award should follow the steps below:

1. Submit an Application: Applicants must submit a detailed research proposal or publication that demonstrates their academic achievements, innovative research, and potential impact.

2. Include a Cover Letter: The cover letter should explain the applicant's motivation for applying, their academic journey, and how their research contributes to the broader academic community.

3. Recommendation Letter(s): Applicants should submit at least one recommendation letter from a faculty member or mentor who can speak to the applicant's academic potential and research contributions.

4. Submission Deadline: Applications should be submitted by [insert deadline]. Late submissions will not be considered.
   
   

Review Process

Applications will be evaluated by a panel of respected scholars, senior academics, and members of the ABS Publisher Editorial Board. The selection process will be based on:

• Innovation and originality of the research.

• Relevance to contemporary societal issues and global challenges.

• Academic rigor and the potential for the research to make a long-term contribution to the field.

• Impact and potential future contributions to the academic community and society at large.
  
  

Announcement of Winners

The ABS Publisher Outstanding Award for Young Scholars will be announced annually on our website and through various academic networks. The winners will be invited to participate in a virtual award ceremony, where they will receive their certificate and be publicly recognized for their achievements.

The ABS Publisher Outstanding Award for Young Scholars is a key part of our mission to support, celebrate, and empower the next generation of scholars. By recognizing the exceptional contributions of young researchers, we aim to inspire and nurture talent that will shape the future of academia and make a meaningful difference in the world.

We encourage all eligible young scholars to apply and take this opportunity to advance their careers, gain recognition, and join a community of influential scholars committed to creating positive social change through research.

For more information and to apply, please visit our website or contact the award committee at publisher@absresearchacademy.com